The Re:Mission study. Evaluating the NHS Low Calorie Diet pilot - an overview of service user data collection methods

Authors

  • Catherine Homer Sport and Physical Activity Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University
  • Karina Kinsella Obesity Institute and School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds
  • Jordan Marwood Obesity Institute and School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds
  • Tamara Brown Obesity Institute and School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds
  • Duncan Radley Obesity Institute and School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds
  • Ken Clare Obesity Institute and School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds
  • Chirag Bakhai Larkside Practice, Churchfield Medical Centre, 322 Crawley Green Road, Luton, Bedfordshire
  • Louisa Ells Obesity Institute and School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2024.433

Keywords:

type 2 diabetes, obesity, Low Calorie Diet, qualitative, longitudinal, weight maintenance, Re:Mission study

Abstract

Introduction: The National Health Service (NHS) Low Calorie Diet (LCD) pilot programme aimed to support people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) to lose weight, reduce glycaemia and potentially achieve T2DM remission using total diet replacement alongside behaviour change support. The Re:Mission study seeks to provide an enhanced understanding of the long-term cost-effectiveness of the programme and its implementation, equity, transferability and normalisation across broad and diverse populations. This article presents an overview of the methods used in the Re:Mission study.

Methods and analysis: A mixed method approach was used to draw together service user insights from across longitudinal and cross-sectional online surveys and semi-structured interviews supported by a modified photovoice technique. Insights were captured from active service users across the three phases of the programme (total diet replacement, food reintroduction and maintenance) in addition to those discharged prematurely. Survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data were thematically analysed and interpreted through a realist informed lens to understand which aspects of the service work and do not work, for whom, in what context and why.

Results: Results from the study are presented elsewhere, with recommendations for policy practice and research.

References

World Health Organization. The Top 10 Causes of Death 2020;(09/12/2020). Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death.

Diabetes UK. How many people in the UK have diabetes? Diabetes UK position statements reports statistics 2023. Available from: https://www.diabetes.org.uk/professionals/position-statements-reports/statistics.

NHS Digital. Health Survey for England, 2021 part 1. 2021.

National Institute for Health Care and Clinical Excellence (NICE). BMI and waist circumference - black, Asian and minority ethnic groups. London, 2013.

Lee JWR, Brancati FL, Yeh H-C. Trends in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in Asians versus whites: results from the United States National Health Interview Survey, 1997–2008. Diabetes Care 2011;34(2):353-7. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-0746

Gatineau M, Hancock C, Holman N, et al. Adult obesity and type 2 diabetes. Oxford: Public Health England; 2014.

Public Health England. Diabetes Prevalence Model. London; 2016.

NHS England. The NHS Long Term Plan: NHS; 2019.

Castellana M, Conte E, Cignarelli A, et al. Efficacy and safety of very low calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) in patients with overweight and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2020;21(1):5-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-019-09514-y

Sellahewa L, Khan C, Lakkunarajah S, Idris I. A systematic review of evidence on the use of very low calorie diets in people with diabetes. Current Diabetes Reviews 2017;13(1):35-46. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573399812666151005123431

Caprio M, Infante M, Moriconi E, et al. Very-low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) in the management of metabolic diseases: systematic review and consensus statement from the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE). Journal Endocrinol Investig 2019;42:1365-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-019-01061-2

Rehackova L, Rodrigues AM, Thom G, et al. Participant experiences in the Diabetes REmission Clinical Trial (DiRECT). Diabetic Medicine 2022;39(1):e14689. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14689

Astbury NM, Piernas C, Hartmann‐Boyce J, Lapworth S, Aveyard P, Jebb SA. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the effectiveness of meal replacements for weight loss. Obesity Reviews 2019;20(4):569-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12816

Churuangsuk C, Hall J, Reynolds A, Griffin SJ, Combet E, Lean ME. Diets for weight management in adults with type 2 diabetes: an umbrella review of published meta-analyses and systematic review of trials of diets for diabetes remission. Diabetologia 2022;65:14-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-021-05577-2

Lean MEJ, Leslie WS, Barnes AC, et al. Durability of a primary care- led weight-management intervention for remission of type 2 diabetes: 2-year results of the DiRECT open-label, cluster- randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2019;7(5):344-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30068-3

Astbury NM, Aveyard P, Nickless A, et al. Doctor Referral of Overweight People to Low Energy total diet replacement Treatment (DROPLET): pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2018;362:k3760. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k3760

Gulati S, Misra A, Tiwari R, Sharma M, Pandey RM, Yadav CP. Effect of high-protein meal replacement on weight and cardiometabolic profile in overweight/obese Asian Indians in North India. Br J Nutrition 2017;117(11):1531-40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517001295

Taheri S, Zaghloul H, Chagoury O, et al. Effect of intensive lifestyle intervention on bodyweight and glycaemia in early type 2 diabetes (DIADEM-I): an open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2020;8(6):477-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30117-0

NHS England. NHS Low Calorie Diet Programme – face to face [one to one/group] delivery model - Service Specification. 2019.

NHS England. NHS Type 2 Diabetes Path to Remission Programme 2023 [Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/diabetes/treatment-care/diabetes-remission/.

Ells L, Radley D, Homer C, et al. A coproduced mixed method evaluation of the NHS England Low-Calorie Diet implementation pilot. Protocol. 2021.

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Internat J Quality Health Care 2007;19(6):349-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

Homer C, Kinsella K, Drew KJ, et al. A fresh start with high hopes: A qualitative evaluation of experiences of the Total Diet Replacement phase of the NHS Low Calorie Diet Programme pilot. Br J Diabetes 2024;24:ONLINE AHEAD OF PUBLICATION. https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2024.435

Homer C, Kinsella K, Brown T, et al. “Trying to make healthy choices”: the challenges of the food reintroduction phase of the NHS Low Calorie Diet Programme pilot for type 2 diabetes. Br J Diabetes 2024;24:ONLINE AHEAD OF PUBLICATION. https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2024.436

Homer C, Kinsella K, Brown T, et al. ‘Life changing or a failure’? Qualitative experiences of service users from the weight maintenance phase of the NHS Low Calorie Diet Programme pilot for type 2 diabetes. Br J Diabetes 2024;24:ONLINE AHEAD OF PUBLICATION. https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2024.432

Radley D, Drew KJ, Homer C, et al. Participant experiences during the NHS Low Calorie Diet Programme Pilot: Findings from an online survey. Br J Diabetes 2024;24:ONLINE AHEAD OF PUBLICATION. https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2024.431

Drew KJ, Homer C, Radley D et al. A qualitative study of the experiences of individuals who did not complete the NHS Low Calorie Diet Programme Pilot. Br J Diabetes 2024;24:ONLINE AHEAD OF PUBLICATION. https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2024.434

Picker. The Picker Principles of Person Centred care 2020 [Available from: https://picker.org/who-we-are/the-picker-principles-of-person-centred-care/.

Clare K, Ojo A, Teke J, et al. ‘Valued and listened to’: the collective experience of patient and public involvement in a national evaluation. Perspectives in Public Health 2022;142(4):199-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/17579139221103184

Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. Sage; 1997.

Sparkes AC, Smith B. Qualitative research methods in sport, exercise and health: From process to product: Routledge; 2013.

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research Psychol 2006;3(2):77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Ells L, Radley D, Homer C, et al. Re:Mission Study Website 2021 https://remision.study/

Downloads

Published

2024-04-16

Most read articles by the same author(s)