Benefits of reducing duration of endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass liner implantation to nine months in treatment of diabesity

Authors

  • Robert E J Ryder Sandwell & West Birmingham NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4424-355X
  • Mahender Yadagiri Sandwell & West Birmingham NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham
  • Caroline Day Aston University, Birmingham
  • Wyn Burbridge Sandwell & West Birmingham NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham
  • Susan P Irwin Sandwell & West Birmingham NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham
  • Hardeep Gandhi Sandwell & West Birmingham NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham
  • Tahira Bashir Sandwell & West Birmingham NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham
  • Rachael A Dean Sandwell & West Birmingham NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham
  • Melanie Wyres Sandwell & West Birmingham NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham
  • Melissa Cull Sandwell & West Birmingham NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham
  • John P Bleasdale Sandwell & West Birmingham NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham
  • Edward N Fogden Sandwell & West Birmingham NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham
  • Mark R Anderson Sandwell & West Birmingham NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham
  • Piya Sen Gupta Sandwell & West Birmingham NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2024.460

Keywords:

DJBL, duodenal-jejunal bypass liner, diabesity, type 2 diabetes, obesity, EndoBarrier®, RESET®

Abstract

Aims: To assess the safety and efficacy of duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) implantation for 9 months or 12 months in patients with obesity and sub-optomally controlled type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Methods: Over 4.25 years DJBLs were implanted in 90 adult patients with obesity and sub-optimally controlled T2DM at a single centre in England. The liners remained in situ for up to 12 months and outcomes were monitored in a registry.

Results: Of the 90 patients (BMI 41.5±7.1kg/m2, HbA1c 79.3±20 mmol/mol), 53% were insulin-treated. During DJBL treatment, there was no difference between the mean±SD fall in HbA1c at 9 months (20.5±18.8mmol/mol) vs. 12 months (20.5±19.4mmol/mol) (p=0.95). The mean±SD weight loss at

9 months (13.8±7.7kg) was 1.6±3.6kg less than that at 12 months (15.4±8.4kg) (p<0.001). By 12 months, 15.6% of patients had had early DJBL removal due to serious adverse events (SAEs), from which they all recovered. Of these SAEs, 43% would have been avoided by DJBL removal at 9 months. Conclusion: DJBL is effective in people with intractable diabesity. To reduce the incidence of SAEs, our data support reducing the recommended/conventional implantation period for DJBL from 12 months to 9 months.

Author Biography

Piya Sen Gupta, Sandwell & West Birmingham NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham

She is also affiliated to Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals, London - see frontsheet of the paper

References

International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas, 10th ed., 2021. https://www.diabetesatlas.org/ (accessed 21 June 2024).

Reaven GM. Banting Lecture 1988. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 1988;37:1595-607. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.37.12.1595

Reaven, GM. Pathophysiology of insulin resistance in human disease. Physiol Rev 1995;75:473–86. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1995.75.3.473

Day C, Bailey CJ. Obesity in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis 2011;11:55-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474651411407418

Holman R. A brief history of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study. Br J Diabetes 2022;22 Suppl 1: S32-35. https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2022.359

UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ 1998;317:703. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7160.703

UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Efficacy of atenolol and captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 39. BMJ 1998;317:71320. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7160.713

UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood- glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998;352(9131):837-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07019-6

Gaede P, Oellgaard J, Carstensen B, et al. Years of life gained by multifactorial intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria: 21 years follow-up on the Steno-2 randomised trial. Diabetologia 2016;59:2298-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-016-4065

Lean MEJ, Leslie WS, Barnes AC, et al. 5-year follow-up of the randomised Diabetes Remission Clinical Trial (DiRECT) of continued support for weight loss maintenance in the UK: an extension study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2024;12:233–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(23)00385-6

Bailey CJ, Day C. Anti-obesity fixed-dose combinations. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis 2012;12:2-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474651412437501

Koliaki C, Liatis S, le Roux CW, Kokkinos A. The role of bariatric surgery to treat diabetes: current challenges and perspectives. BMC Endocr Disord 2017;17:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-017-0202-6

Brito JP, Montori VM, Davis AM. Metabolic surgery in the treatment algorithm for type 2 diabetes: a joint statement by international diabetes organizations. JAMA 2017;317:635–6. https://doi.org/10.1001.jama.2016.20563

Jirapinyo, Haas AV, Thompson CC. Effect of the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes with obesity: a meta-analysis with secondary analysis on weight loss and hormonal changes. Diabetes Care 2018;41(5):1106–15. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-1985

Ryder REJ, Irwin SP, Burbridge W, et al. The United Kingdom's first NHS Endobarrier service for advanced diabesity: 1-year outcomes for all 62 treated patients. Br J Diabetes 2019;19:110–17. https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2019.226

Laubner K, Riedel N, Fink K, etal. Comparative efficacy and safety of the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a case control study. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20(8):1868–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13300

Ryder REJ, Sen Gupta P, Yadagiri M, et al. Improvement in renal function in participants in the first UK National Health Service (NHS) EndoBarrier service for uncontrolled diabesity. Curr Res Diabetes Obes J 2021; 15(1): 555902. https://doi.org/10.19080/CRDOJ.2021.15.555902

Ryder REJ, Yadagiri M, Burbridge W, et al. The United Kingdom’s first NHS EndoBarrier service for long-standing poorly controlled type 2 diabetes and obesity: outcomes one year after EndoBarrier removal. Br J Diabetes 2021;21:76-83. https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2021.295

de Jonge C, Rensen SS, Verdam FJ, et al. Endoscopic duodenal– jejunal bypass liner rapidly improves type 2 diabetes. Obes Surg 2013;23:1354–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-0921-3

Betzel B, Homan J, Aarts EO, et al. Weight reduction and improvement in diabetes by the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner: a 198 patient cohort study. Surg Endosc 2017;31:2881–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5299-6

Kaválková P, Mráz M, Trachta P, et al. Endocrine effects of duodenal–jejunal exclusion in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Endocrinol 2016;231(1):11–22. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-16-0206

Koehestanie P, Dogan K, Berends F, etal. Duodenal-jejunal bypass liner implantation provokes rapid weight loss and improved glycemic control, accompanied by elevated fasting ghrelin levels. Endosc Int Open 2014;2(1):E21–E27. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1365222

Thompson CC, Jirapinyo P, Brethauer S, et al. A multicenter randomized sham-controlled trial of a duodenal jejunal bypass liner for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Gastrointestinal Endocrinol 2022: 6 (suppl): AB10-AB11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2022.04.076

RESET. Non-surgical treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity. A video showing the endoscopic process of implantation and explantation. https://morphicmedical.com/reset/ (accessed 03 August 2023).

Ryder REJ, Yadagiri M, Burbridge W, etal. EndoBarrier treatment for longstanding type 2 diabetes and obesity: outcomes one year after EndoBarrier in 90 consecutively treated patients. Practical Diabetes 2022;39(3):13-16a. https://doi.org/10.1002/pdi.2393

Ryder REJ, Yadagiri M, Burbridge W, etal. Duodenal-jejunal bypass liner for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity: 3-year outcomes in the First National Health Service (NHS) EndoBarrier Service. Diabetic Medicine 2022;39:e14827. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14827

Ryder REJ, Yadagiri M, Burbridge W, et al. Duodenal-jejunal bypass liner for treatment of T2DM and obesity: 4-year outcomes in the first National Health Service (NHS) EndoBarrier service. Br J Diabetes 2022;22:82-6. https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2022.351

Hayee B, Sen Gupta P, Anderson M, et al. Endoscopic proximal intestinal exclusion can improve non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in patients with diabesity. Proceedings of the Digestive Diseases Week (DDW), San Diego, May 2016.

Ryder REJ, Laubner K, Benes M, etal. Endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass liner treatment for type 2 diabetes and obesity: glycemic and cardiovascular disease risk factor improvements in 1,022 patients treated worldwide. Diabetes Care 2023;46:e89–e91. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-1952

Wing RR, Marsha D, Marcus MD, Epstein LH, Salata R. Type II diabetic subjects lose less weight than their overweight nondiabetic spouses. Diabetes Care 1987;10(5):563–6. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.10.5.563

Bailey CJ, Flatt PR, Conlon JM. Recent advances in peptide-based therapies for obesity and type 2 diabetes. Peptides 2024;173: 171149(1-9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2024.171149

American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) Public/Professional Education Committee. Bariatric surgery: postoperative concerns. Revised 02/07/2008 | Published: 05/23/2007. See: https://asmbs.org/resources/bariatric-surgery- postoperative-concerns

(‘ENDO’). Safety and efficacy of EndoBarrier in subjects with type 2 diabetes who are obese (ENDO). Clinical Trials .gov. NCT01728116. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01728116 (accessed 18 May 2024).

RESET System Pivotal Trial (Rev F) (STEP-1). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04101669 (accessed 14 October 2024).

Ruban A, Glaysher MA, Miras AD, et al. A duodenal sleeve bypass device added to intensive medical therapy for obesity with type 2 diabetes: a RCT. Efficacy Mech Eval 2020:7(6). (accessed 18 May 2024)

Taylor NP. Fierce Biotech. GI Dynamics loses CE mark over quality nonconformance. Fierce Biotech13th November 2017 https://www.fiercebiotech.com/medtech/gi-dynamics-loses-ce- mark-over-quality-nonconformance (accessed 18 May 2024)

McCall B. Temporary Gut Liner Lowers Weight, A1c. Medscape April 19, 2024. https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/temporary- gut-liner-lowers-weight-a1c-2024a10007kv?&icd=login_success_ email_match_fpf

Birmingham EndoBarrier Treated Patients. Pictures and video interviews obtained with written consent for online publication. https://abcd.care/sites/default/files/site_uploads/Endobarrier/Birmi ngham_EndoBarrier_patients.pdf . (accessed 21 June 2024). NB the costs show for the patient on pages 15-20 are from 2016.

Ryder R, Yadagiri M, Munro L, et al. Endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) treatment for type 2 diabetes and obesity: comparing 9 vs 12 month implantation in a worldwide registry. O055 / #438 Oral Presentations 07. Diabetes Technology Therapeutics 2024; 26: s2, February 2024. Abstract 438, page A-68. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.2525.abstracts

Downloads

Published

2024-10-24

Issue

Section

Original Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >>