A qualitative study of the experiences of individuals who did not complete the NHS Low Calorie Diet Programme Pilot
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2024.434Keywords:
type 2 diabetes, obesity, Low Calorie Diet, Re:Mission studyAbstract
Background: Attrition remains a significant public health challenge as individuals who do not complete programmes are likely to have poorer programme outcomes. On calorie- restricted diets, including the NHS Low Calorie Diet (LCD) Programme pilot, approximately 50% of people are discharged prematurely, and thus do not complete the programme. Reducing attrition therefore has the potential to improve programme efficacy, impact and cost-effectiveness.
Methods: Ten semi-structured interviews were conducted with purposively sampled individuals who did not complete the NHS LCD programme. Interviews explored service user experiences of the programme and experiences of being discharged. Interview data were analysed thematically.
Results: Four core themes were identified: 1) the pre- programme struggles of service users and their route to LCD; 2) a positive and impactful programme; 3) life gets in the way; and 4) a perceived lack of support from the provider. These findings show that individuals had pre-programme struggles and a series of life events that constrained their good intentions, and whilst they were positive about the programme, they were critical of the support they received from providers to deal with their life circumstances.
Conclusions: Policy makers and providers can act proportionately to ensure that programmes, such as the NHS LCD Programme pilot, recognise the circumstances and context of people’s lives, and take a more person-centred approach.
References
Homer C, Kinsella K, Marwood J, et al. The Re:Mission study: Evaluating the NHS Low Calorie Diet pilot - an overview of service user data collection. Br J Diabetes 2024;24:ONLINE AHEAD OF PUBLICATION. https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2024.433
Moroshko I, Brennan L, O'Brien P. Predictors of dropout in weight loss interventions: a systematic review of the literature. Obesity Reviews 2011;12(11):912-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00915.x
Mattfeldt-Beman MK, Corrigan SA, Stevens VJ, et al. Participants’ evaluation of a weight-loss program. J American Dietetic Association 1999;99(1):66-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00018-8
Miller BM, Brennan L. Measuring and reporting attrition from obesity treatment programs: a call to action! Obesity Research Clinical Practice 2015;9(3):187-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orcp.2014.08.007
Burgess E, Hassmén P, Pumpa K. Determinants of adherence to lifestyle intervention in adults with obesity: a systematic review. Clinical Obesity 2017;7:123-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12183
Rehackova L, Rodrigues AM, Thom G, et al. Participant experiences in the diabetes REmission clinical trial (DiRECT). Diabetic Medicine 2022;39(1):e14689. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14689
Brown A, Frost G, Taheri S. Is there a place for low-energy formula diets in weight management. Br J Obes 2015;1(3):84-119.
Mata J, Todd PM, Lippke S. When weight management lasts. Lower perceived rule complexity increases adherence. Appetite 2010; 54(1):37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2009.09.004
Dansinger ML, Gleason JA, Griffith JL, et al. Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone diets for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction: a randomized trial. JAMA 2005; 293(1):43-53. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.1.43
Handjieva‐Darlenska T, Handjiev S, Larsen TM, et al. Predictors of weight loss maintenance and attrition during a 6‐month dietary intervention period: results from the DiOGenes study. Clinical Obesity 2011;1(2‐3):62-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-8111.2011.00010.x
Nobles J, Griffiths C, Pringle A, et al. Design programmes to maximise participant engagement: a predictive study of programme and participant characteristics associated with engagement in paediatric weight management. Internat Journal Behavioral Nutrition Physical Activity 2016;13(1):76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0399-1
Rodrigues AM, Haste A, Penn L, et al. Stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of the National Health Service diabetes prevention programme in England: qualitative study with service users, intervention providers and deliverers, commissioners and referrers. BMC Health Serv Res 2020;20:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12913- 020-05160-2
Bakhai C, Barron E, Gorton T, et al. Early findings from the NHS Type 2 Diabetes Path to Remission Programme (formerly NHS Low Calorie Diet Programme). Diabetes UK Professional Conference; 26 to 28 April; Exhibition Centre Liverpool, 2023.
Braun V, Clarke V, Weate P. Using thematic analysis in sport and exercise research. In: Smith B, Sparkes AC, editors. Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise. London: Routledge; 2016. pp 191-205.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal Quality Health Care 2007;19(6): 349-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Brown A, Dornhorst A, McGowan B, et al. Low-energy total diet replacement intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity treated with insulin: a randomized trial. BMJ Open Diabetes Research Care 2020;8(1):e001012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001012
Strack F, Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality Social Psychology Review 2004;8(3):220-47. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1
Maina JG, Balkhiyarova Z, Nouwen A, et al. Bidirectional Mendelian randomization and multiphenotype GWAS show causality and shared pathophysiology between depression and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2023;46(9):1707-14. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-2373
Sartorius N. Depression and diabetes. Dialogues Clinical Neuroscience 2022;20:47-52. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2018.20.1/nsartorius
Abiri B, Hosseinpanah F, Banihashem S, et al. Mental health and quality of life in different obesity phenotypes: a systematic review. Health Quality of Life Outcomes 2022;20(1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-022-01974-2
Jones RA, Mueller J, Sharp SJ, et al. The impact of participant mental health on attendance and engagement in a trial of behavioural weight management programmes: secondary analysis of the WRAP randomised controlled trial. International Journal Behavioral Nutrition Physical Activity 2021;18(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01216-6
Toth-Capelli KM, Brawer R, Plumb J, et al. Stage of change and other predictors of participant retention in a behavioral weight management program in primary care. Health Promotion Practice 2013;14(3):441-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839912460871
Hession M, Rolland C, Kulkarni U, et al. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of low‐carbohydrate vs. low‐fat/ low‐calorie diets in the management of obesity and its comorbidities. Obesity Reviews 2009;10(1):36-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00518.x
Avison WR, Thomas Graduate SS. Stress. In: Cockerham WC, editor. The New Blackwell Companion to Medical Sociology. Oxford: Wiley- Blackwell; 2009.
Cockerham WC. The social causes of health and disease, 3rd Edition. Polity; 2020.
Howarth E, Bower PJ, Kontopantelis E, et al. ‘Going the distance’: an independent cohort study of engagement and dropout among the first 100 000 referrals into a large-scale diabetes prevention program. BMJ Open Diabetes Research Care 2020;8(2):e001835. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001835
Kleine HD, McCormack LA, Drooger A, et al. Barriers to and facilitators of weight management in adults using a meal replacement program that includes health coaching. Journal Primary Care Community Health 2019;10:2150132719851643. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150132719851643
Ross LJ, Byrnes A, Hay RL, et al. Exploring the highs and lows of very low carbohydrate high fat diets on weight loss and diabetes‐and cardiovascular disease‐related risk markers: a systematic review. Nutrition Dietetics 2021;78(1):41-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12649
Whitehead M. The concepts and principles of equity and health. Health Promotion International 1991;6(3):217-28. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/6.3.217
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The author(s) retain copyright.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Publish & Transfer of Copyright Agreement
For the mutual benefit and protection of the Author and the Journal Owner/Publisher it is necessary that the Author provides formal written Consent to Publish and Transfer of Copyright before publication of the Work.
