Equity and local health systems: a qualitative evaluation of the experiences of local health service leads during the first two years of the NHS Low Calorie Diet programme pilot
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15277/bjd.2023.416Keywords:
T2DM, obesity, Low Calorie Diet, equity, inequalities, proportionate universalism, Re:Mission studyAbstract
Background: Obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) can both profoundly impact health and wellbeing. Their prevalence largely follows a social gradient. The National Health Service Low Calorie Diet programme in England aims to support people to achieve T2DM remission while also reducing health inequalities. We aimed to explore the experiences of local health service leads and identify barriers and facilitators in relation to the equitable mobilisation of the Low Calorie Diet programme.
Methods: Twenty semi-structured interviews were completed with 24 locality leads across the first two years of the Low Calorie Diet programme. Interviewees were purposively sampled from the 10 localities who undertook the Low Calorie Diet programme pilot. Each interview explored a number of topics of interest, including referrals, training, communication, incentivisation, governance and engagement, before being subjected to a thematic analysis.
Results: From the data, seven core themes were identified: COVID-19 and primary care capacity and engagement; methods of communication; approaches to training; approaches to incentivisation; approaches to referrals; barriers to referrals; and the importance of collaboration. COVID-19 presented a specific challenge to the mobilisation and delivery of the Low Calorie Diet programme; however, our findings demonstrate the large variation and differences in the approaches taken when delivering the programme across 10 geographically and demographically distinct pilot sites. We also identified a lack of a recognised approach or strategy to mobilisation and delivery support for the Low Calorie Diet programme, such as proportionate universalism, which is a social policy response to tackling health inequalities by ensuring that service delivery is equitable.
Conclusions: Health inequalities remain a significant challenge, and health service leads have the potential to adopt an equity perspective from the start of programme mobilisation. In doing so, resources at their disposal can be managed equitably and can therefore contribute to efforts to reduce the potential occurrence of intervention-generated inequalities.
References
Gatineau M, Hancock C, Holman N, etal. Adult obesity and type 2 diabetes. London: Public Health England, 2014: 5-14.
NHS Digital. Health Survey for England, 2021 part 1. London: National Statistics, https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/health-survey-for-england/2021
Public Health England. Diabetes prevalence model. London: Public Health England, 2016. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Marmot The Health Gap: the challenge of an Unequal World. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.
Marmot M. The Marmot review: Fair society, healthy lives. The Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England Post-2010. London: The Marmot Review, PublicHealth 2012;126 (Suppl 1): S4-S10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2012.05.014
Green H, Fernandez R, MacPhail The social determinants of health and health outcomes among adults during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review. Public Health Nursing 2021;38(6):942-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12959
Marmot M, Allen J, Goldblatt P, etal. Build Back Fairer - The COVID-19 Marmot Review. The Pandemic, Socioeconomic and Health Inequalities in England. London: Institute of Health Equity, 2020.
Khunti K, Feldman EL, Laiteerapong N, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ethnic minority groups with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2023;46(2):228-36.
Ricci‐Cabello I, Ruiz‐Perez I, De Labry‐Lima AO, et al. Do social inequalities exist in terms of the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, control and monitoring of diabetes? A systematic review. Health Soc Care Community 2010;18(6):572-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00960.x
Bleich SN, Jarlenski MP, Bell CN, et al. Health inequalities: trends, progress, and AnnuRevPublicHealth 2012;33:7-40. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124658
Cleland CL, Tully MA, Kee F, et al. The effectiveness of physical activity interventions in socio-economically disadvantaged communities: a systematic Prev Med 2012;54(6):371-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.04.004
Lorenc T, Oliver Adverse effects of public health interventions: a conceptual framework. J Epidemiol Community Health 2014;68(3):288-90. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2013-203118
Alvaro C, Jackson L, Kirk S, et al. Moving Canadian governmental policies beyond a focus on individual lifestyle: some insights from complexity and critical Health Promotion International 2010;26(1):91-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daq052
Whyte MB, Hinton W, McGovern A, et al. Disparities in glycaemic control, monitoring, and treatment of type 2 diabetes in England: a retrospective cohort PLoS Medicine 2019;16(10):e1002942. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002942
Frohlich KL, Potvin L. Transcending the known in public health practice: the inequality paradox: the population approach and vulnerable populations. Am J Public Health 2008;98(2):216-21. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.114777
Castellana M, Conte E, Cignarelli A, etal. Efficacy and safety of very low calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) in patients with overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Endocr Metabolic Dis 2020;21(1):5-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-019- 09514-y
Sellahewa L, Khan C, Lakkunarajah S, etal. A systematic review of evidence on the use of very low calorie diets in people with Curr Diabetes Reviews 2017;13(1):35-46. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573399812666151005123431
Caprio M, Infante M, Moriconi E, et al. Very-low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) in the management of metabolic diseases: systematic review and consensus statement from the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE). J Endocrinol Invest 2019;42(11):1365-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-019-01061-2
Rehackova L, Arnott B, Araujo-Soares V, et al. Efficacy and acceptability of very low energy diets in overweight and obese people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review with meta‐analyses. DiabeticMed 2016;33(5):580-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13005
Astbury NM, Piernas C, Hartmann-Boyce J, etal. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of meal replacements for weight loss. Obesity Rev 2019;20(4):569-87. https://doi.org/1111/obr.12816
Lean ME, Leslie WS, Barnes AC, etal. Durability of a primary care- led weight-management intervention for remission of type 2 diabetes: 2-year results of the DiRECT open-label, cluster- randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2019;7(5):344-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30068-3
Astbury NM, Aveyard P, Nickless A, et al. Doctor Referral of Overweight People to Low Energy total diet replacement Treatment (DROPLET): pragmatic randomised controlled trial.BMJ 2018;362: k3760 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k3760
Ard JD, Lewis KH, Rothberg A, et al. Effectiveness of a total meal replacement program (OPTIFAST program) on weight loss: results from the OPTIWIN Obesity (Silver Spring) 2019;27(1):22-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ony.22303
NHS The NHS Long Term Plan. NHS, 2019.
Bhat K, Easwarathasan R, Jacob M, et al. Identifying and under- standing the factors that influence the functioning of integrated healthcare systems in the NHS: a systematic literature BMJ Open 2022;12(4):e049296. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049296
Low calorie diets to treat obesity and type 2 diabetes. 2019 [Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/diabetes/treatment-care/low-calorie-diets/.
National Health Service Act 2006, Stat. c41 (2006). https://legislation.gov.uk
Equality Act 2010, c15 (2010). https://www.legislation.gov.uk
NHS England and NHS Improvement. NHS Low Calorie Diet Programme – face to face [one to one/group] delivery model - Service Specification. England, 2019. https://www.england.nhs.uk
Williams O, Coen SE, Gibson Comment on: “Equity in physical activity: a misguided goal”. Sports Med 2019;49:637-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-01047-9
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19(6):349-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/iintqhc/mzm042
Pawson R. The science of evaluation: a realist manifesto. Sage Publications, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473913820
Ells L, Radley D, Homer A coproduced mixed method evaluation of the NHS England Low-Calorie Diet implementation pilot. Protocol 2021, 12th March 2021. https://fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/NIHR132075
Braun V, Clarke V, Weate Using thematic analysis in sport and exercise research. In: Smith B, Sparkes AC, editors. Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise. London: Routledge, 2016, 191-205.
Tao W, Agerholm J, Burström B. The impact of reimbursement systems on equity in access and quality of primary care: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Res 2016;16(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1805-8
NHS Enhanced Service Specification Weight management 2022/23 - Version 1. NHS; 2022. https://www.england.nhs.uk
Re:Mission. Re:Mission - An Evaluation of the NHS Low Calorie Diet Programme 2020 [Available from: https://www.remission.study/.
Fisher M, Harris P, Freeman T, et al. Implementing universal and targeted policies for health equity: lessons from Int J Health Policy Manage 2022;11(10):2308-18. https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.157
Olivera JN, Ford J, Sowden S, et al. Conceptualisation of health inequalities by local healthcare systems: a document analysis. Health Soc Care Community 2022;30(6):e3977-e3984 https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13791
Health and Social Care Act 2012. [Available from: legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/7/contents/enacted.
Ford J, Sowden S, Olivera J, etal. Transforming health systems to reduce health FutureHealthcJ 2021;8(2):e204-e209. https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2021-0018
Sadare O, Williams M, Simon Implementation of the Health Equity Impact Assessment (HEIA) tool in a local public health setting: challenges, facilitators, and impacts. Can J Public Health 2020;111(2):212-19. https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-019-00269-2
Peeters A, Backholer How to influence the obesity landscape using health policies. Int J Obesity 2017;41(6):835-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2017.24
Public Health Local action on health inequalities: tackling health inequalities through action on the social determinants of health: lessons from experience. London: Public Health England, 2014.
Mackenzie M, Hastings A, Babbel B, et al. Proportionate universalism as a route to mitigating health inequalities? Exploring political, policy and practice uncertainties in times of In: Fee D, Kober-smith A, editors. Inequalities in the UK. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited; 2017. ISBN:978-1-78714-480-4
Brassolotto J, Raphael D, Baldeo N. Epistemological barriers to addressing the social determinants of health among public health professionals in Ontario, Canada: a qualitative CriticalPublic Health 2014;24(3):321-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2013.820256
Rodrigues AM, Haste A, Penn L, et al. Stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of the National Health Service diabetes prevention programme in England: qualitative study with service users, intervention providers and deliverers, commissioners and BMC Health Services Res 2020;20:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05160-2
Kontopantelis E, Reeves D, Valderas JM, et al. Recorded quality of primary care for patients with diabetes in England before and after the introduction of a financial incentive scheme: a longitudinal observational study. BMJ Quality Safety 2013;22(1):53-64. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001033
Oliver A, Brown A consideration of user financial incentives to address health inequalities. JHealthPolPolicyLaw 2012;37(2):201-26. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-153602
Koshy E, Millett The ‘Quality and Outcomes Framework’: improving care, but are all patients benefiting? SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England; 2008, 432-3.
Shaw SE, Smith JA, Porter A, et The work of commissioning: a multisite case study of healthcare commissioning in England’s NHS. BMJ Open 2013;3(9):e003341. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003341
Carey G, Crammond B, De Leeuw EJ. Towards health equity: a framework for the application of proportionate Int J Equity Health 2015;14(1):81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-015-0207-6
Coggon J, Adams ‘Let them choose not to eat cake...’: Public health ethics, effectiveness and equity in government obesity strategy. Future Healthc J 2021;8(1):49-52. https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2020-0246
McManus E, Elliott J, Meacock R, et al. The effects of structure, process and outcome incentives on primary care referrals to a national prevention Health Economics 2021;30(6):1393-416. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4262
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 British Journal of Diabetes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Publish & Transfer of Copyright Agreement
For the mutual benefit and protection of the Author and the Journal Owner/Publisher it is necessary that the Author provides formal written Consent to Publish and Transfer of Copyright before publication of the Work.
